thirupathi vs Inspector of Police, Viralimalai PS , Cr.No. 87/2026 — 592/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPD010010632026

Case disposed

Filing Number

835/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

592/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Pudukkottai

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

87

Police Station

Viralimalai.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2)
MINES & MINERALS (DEVELOPMENT & REGULATION) Act, 1957 Section 21(1)

Petitioner(s)

thirupathi

Adv. Alagan.K.M

Respondent(s)

Inspector of Police, Viralimalai PS (Police Station) , Cr.No. 87/2026

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

07-03-2026

Disposed

02-03-2026

Issue of Service

27-02-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Copy of Order

The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai granted anticipatory bail to Thirupathy, accused of stealing gravel sand under Sections 303(2) BNS and Section 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals Act, 1957. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 2,000 non-refundable deposit, Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, and surrender within 30 days, noting that material investigation was complete and the petitioner showed willingness to comply with court directives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai granted anticipatory bail to Thirupathy, accused of stealing gravel sand under Sections 303(2) BNS and Section 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals Act, 1957. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 2,000 non-refundable deposit, Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, and surrender within 30 days, noting that material investigation was complete and the petitioner showed willingness to comply with court directives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Pudukkottai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case