Kalimuthu vs Inspector of Police, Avudaiyarkovil Police Station Crime No. 21/2026 — 580/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPD010010282026
Filing Number
820/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
580/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Pudukkottai
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kalimuthu
Adv. KMS.Senthilkumar
-
2.Muthuvel
-
3.Palaniyammal
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police, Avudaiyarkovil Police Station Crime No. 21/2026
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons (Kalimuthu, Muthuvel, and Palaniammal) charged under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 351(2) and Tamil Nadu Prevention of Harmful Publications Act section 4, arising from a quarrel involving alleged assault. The court found that investigation was substantially complete, both parties had registered counter-cases, and injuries were minor with all victims discharged from hospital, justifying bail despite prosecution opposition. Bail was conditional upon executing a Rs.10,000 bond each with sureties, daily reporting for 15 days, and surrender within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 580/2026
Case Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons (Kalimuthu, Muthuvel, and Palaniammal) charged under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 351(2) and Tamil Nadu Prevention of Harmful Publications Act section 4, arising from a quarrel involving alleged assault. The court found that investigation was substantially complete, both parties had registered counter-cases, and injuries were minor with all victims discharged from hospital, justifying bail despite prosecution opposition. Bail was conditional upon executing a Rs.10,000 bond each with sureties, daily reporting for 15 days, and surrender within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts