Kalimuthu vs Inspector of Police, Avudaiyarkovil Police Station Crime No. 21/2026 — 580/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPD010010282026

Case disposed

Filing Number

820/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

580/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Pudukkottai

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3)

Petitioner(s)

Kalimuthu

Adv. KMS.Senthilkumar

Muthuvel

Palaniyammal

Respondent(s)

Inspector of Police, Avudaiyarkovil Police Station Crime No. 21/2026

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

07-03-2026

Disposed

03-03-2026

Issue of Service

02-03-2026

Issue of Service

27-02-2026

Issue of Service

26-02-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons (Kalimuthu, Muthuvel, and Palaniammal) charged under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 351(2) and Tamil Nadu Prevention of Harmful Publications Act section 4, arising from a quarrel involving alleged assault. The court found that investigation was substantially complete, both parties had registered counter-cases, and injuries were minor with all victims discharged from hospital, justifying bail despite prosecution opposition. Bail was conditional upon executing a Rs.10,000 bond each with sureties, daily reporting for 15 days, and surrender within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons (Kalimuthu, Muthuvel, and Palaniammal) charged under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 351(2) and Tamil Nadu Prevention of Harmful Publications Act section 4, arising from a quarrel involving alleged assault. The court found that investigation was substantially complete, both parties had registered counter-cases, and injuries were minor with all victims discharged from hospital, justifying bail despite prosecution opposition. Bail was conditional upon executing a Rs.10,000 bond each with sureties, daily reporting for 15 days, and surrender within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Pudukkottai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case