Rasu vs Inspector Of Police, Thirumayam Police Station, Crime No.48/2025 — 546/2026
Case under Mines & Minerals (development & Regulation) Act, 1957 Section 4(1)(1A),21(1),21(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPD010009822026
Filing Number
779/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
546/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Pudukkottai
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
48
Police Station
Thirumayam.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rasu
Adv. Ragupathi.P
Respondent(s)
Inspector Of Police, Thirumayam Police Station, Crime No.48/2025
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 02-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 26-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 24-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Rasu, who is accused of illegally storing minerals without government permission under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The court rejected the plea considering the serious nature of the offense, the petitioner's six previous cases, the transfer of the case to CBDID, and an initiated Goondas proposal, finding no change in circumstances to interfere with the earlier dismissal order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Rasu, who is accused of illegally storing minerals without government permission under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The court rejected the plea considering the serious nature of the offense, the petitioner's six previous cases, the transfer of the case to CBDID, and an initiated Goondas proposal, finding no change in circumstances to interfere with the earlier dismissal order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts