Nizam Moideen vs Inspector of Police, Adhanakkottai Police Station, Crime No 16/2026 — 518/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 275,123. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPD010009342026
Filing Number
745/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
518/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Pudukkottai
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
16
Police Station
Adhanakkottai
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nizam Moideen
Adv. Muthaiya. Solai
Respondent(s)
Inspector of Police, Adhanakkottai Police Station, Crime No 16/2026
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 24-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 23-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai granted bail to Nijam Moideen, accused of possessing and selling 225 packets of Hans (tobacco) in violation of BNS sections 275, 123 and COTPA Act 2003, considering the investigation's near completion and time in custody. The bail was granted with stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days in Kanniyakumari District, non-tampering with witnesses, and restrictions on leaving the jurisdiction without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai granted bail to Nijam Moideen, accused of possessing and selling 225 packets of Hans (tobacco) in violation of BNS sections 275, 123 and COTPA Act 2003, considering the investigation's near completion and time in custody. The bail was granted with stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days in Kanniyakumari District, non-tampering with witnesses, and restrictions on leaving the jurisdiction without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts