Thiruppathi vs Inspector of Police, Thirugokarnam Police Station, Crime No.34/2026 — 516/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 275,123. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPD010009302026
Filing Number
743/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
516/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Pudukkottai
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
34
Police Station
Thirugokarnam
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Thiruppathi
Adv. Sivan.S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police, Thirugokarnam Police Station, Crime No.34/2026
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Thirupathi, accused of possessing and selling 510 packets of Hans (tobacco) worth 10.2 kg in violation of the Tobacco Act and BNS sections 275 and 123. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, and restriction to Kanniyakumari District, considering the nearly completed investigation and the accused's undertaking not to repeat the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 516/2026
The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Thirupathi, accused of possessing and selling 510 packets of Hans (tobacco) worth 10.2 kg in violation of the Tobacco Act and BNS sections 275 and 123. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, and restriction to Kanniyakumari District, considering the nearly completed investigation and the accused's undertaking not to repeat the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts