Meenambal vs Manivannan Advocate - K.R. SIVAM, B.COM., LLB., — 652/2021
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 40. Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNPB090013692021
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
635/2021
Filing Date
28-08-2020
Registration No
652/2021
Registration Date
28-08-2020
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kunnam
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Kunnam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Meenambal
Adv. DURAI.PERIYASAMY, M.A.,B.L.,
Ayyadurai
Adv. DURAI. PERIYASAMY, B.Sc., LLB.,
Respondent(s)
Manivannan Advocate - K.R. SIVAM, B.COM., LLB.,
Ponnusamy
Adv. V. RAMAMOORTHY, B.Sc., B.L.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Kunnam
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 19-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 12-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 03-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 28-01-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a civil suit (Original Case No. 652/2021) from the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Kunnam, dated April 21, 2025. The document records the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of witness DW1 (Manivandan, a 54-year-old teacher) regarding a property dispute involving land in survey numbers 88/7 and related inheritance matters concerning ancestral property distribution among family members. The witness's testimony was recorded in open court and admitted as correct by both the witness and the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a civil suit (Original Case No. 652/2021) from the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Kunnam, dated April 21, 2025. The document records the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of witness DW1 (Manivandan, a 54-year-old teacher) regarding a property dispute involving land in survey numbers 88/7 and related inheritance matters concerning ancestral property distribution among family members. The witness's testimony was recorded in open court and admitted as correct by both the witness and the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts