State Government of Tamilnadu, its rep by Inspector of Police, Mangalamedu.P.S vs Chellamuthu(Absconding) — 71/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324,506(2)IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNPB090008262024
Filing Number
777/2024
Filing Date
27-05-2024
Registration No
71/2024
Registration Date
27-05-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kunnam
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Kunnam
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
385
Police Station
POLICE STATION, MANGALAMADU, PERMBALUR.
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government of Tamilnadu, its rep by Inspector of Police, Mangalamedu.P.S
Adv. THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, JM COURTS, PERAMBALUR
Respondent(s)
Chellamuthu(Absconding)
Ramasamy
Adv. P. RAMESH
Kolanjappa
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Kunnam
Disposed
Questioning
Evidence
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 23-02-2026 | Service Pending |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The District Munsif Court in Kunnam acquitted accused Ramasamy (A2) of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 324, and 506(ii), finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court found the key prosecution witnesses gave contradictory and unreliable testimony, with the complainant and injured witness providing vague accounts that didn't specifically identify the accused's role in the alleged assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Judgment Summary The District Munsif Court in Kunnam acquitted accused Ramasamy (A2) of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 324, and 506(ii), finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court found the key prosecution witnesses gave contradictory and unreliable testimony, with the complainant and injured witness providing vague accounts that didn't specifically identify the accused's role in the alleged assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts