Minor Paramesh Raju rep by its Mother Selvarani vs Selvanayagam Advocate - S. ARUNAN, M.Sc., B.L., — 391/2021

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(d). Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNPB090007972021

Amendment

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

383/2021

Filing Date

03-04-2017

Registration No

391/2021

Registration Date

03-04-2017

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kunnam

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Kunnam

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(d)
Ia/3/2024 Classification : Substituted Service Petition Section Minor Paramesh Raju rep by its Mother SelvaraniSelvanayagam

Petitioner(s)

Minor Paramesh Raju rep by its Mother Selvarani

Adv. N. CHAKKARAVARTHY, M.A., B.L.,

Respondent(s)

Selvanayagam Advocate - S. ARUNAN, M.Sc., B.L.,

R. Saravanan

Adv. S. ARUNAN, M.Sc., B.L.,

Sankaranathan

Adv. S. ARUNAN, M.Sc., B.L.,

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Kunnam

30-04-2026

Amendment

11-03-2026

Amendment

11-12-2025

Amendment

25-11-2025

Amendment

31-10-2025

Amendment

Interim Orders

28-03-2022
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Summary In Original Case No. 391/2021 heard on March 28, 2022, the District Civil and Munsiff Court in Kunnaam recorded the examination-in-chief of witness PW-1 (Selvarani, a farmer aged 41) under Section 9 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness submitted photocopies of plot documents provided at the time of the agreement and filed a layout copy of the plot, marked as Exhibit 5, with the original documents stated to be with the promoter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Original Case No. 391/2021 heard on March 28, 2022, the District Civil and Munsiff Court in Kunnaam recorded the examination-in-chief of witness PW-1 (Selvarani, a farmer aged 41) under Section 9 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness submitted photocopies of plot documents provided at the time of the agreement and filed a layout copy of the plot, marked as Exhibit 5, with the original documents stated to be with the promoter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kunnam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case