Arumugam vs Chinnasamy Advocate - Exparte — 635/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7, R.1. Status: Ex-Parte Evidence. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNPB060015072019
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
Filing Number
454/2019
Filing Date
09-01-2017
Registration No
635/2019
Registration Date
09-01-2017
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Veppanthattai
Judge
11-DISTRICT MUNSIF-CUM-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VEPPANTHATTAI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arumugam
Adv. R. MUTHAIYA, B.Sc., B.L.
Chinnapillai rep by her power agent is her husband /1st plaintiff.
Adv. R. MUTHAIYA, B.Sc., B.L.
Respondent(s)
Chinnasamy Advocate - Exparte
Vellaiyammal
Adv. Exparte
Kannusamy
Adv. Exparte
Araiye
Adv. Exparte
State Government rep by its The District Collector
Adv. Exparte
The Tahsildar
Adv. Exparte
The Deputy Surveyor
Adv. Govt pleader
Hearing History
Judge: 11-DISTRICT MUNSIF-CUM-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VEPPANTHATTAI.
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 06-02-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 06-01-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 09-12-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Original Case No. 635/2019 before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court at Vepanthattai (Tamil Nadu), the examination-in-chief of witness PW-2 (Muththamizh Selvam, age 35) was recorded on November 24, 2025. The witness confirmed his written affidavit and authenticated the signature and contents therein. The case has been adjourned to allow cross-examination by the defendant's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Original Case No. 635/2019 before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court at Vepanthattai (Tamil Nadu), the examination-in-chief of witness PW-2 (Muththamizh Selvam, age 35) was recorded on November 24, 2025. The witness confirmed his written affidavit and authenticated the signature and contents therein. The case has been adjourned to allow cross-examination by the defendant's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts