Rameshapee @ Ramija peebee vs Karuppan Advocate - MKS. RETINAVEL @ S. RATHINAVEL, M.A., B.L., — 186/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7, R.1. Status: Ex-Parte Evidence. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNPB060012392019
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
Filing Number
331/2019
Filing Date
25-02-2011
Registration No
186/2019
Registration Date
25-02-2011
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Veppanthattai
Judge
11-DISTRICT MUNSIF-CUM-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VEPPANTHATTAI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rameshapee @ Ramija peebee
Adv. E. RAMALINGAM, B.Sc., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Karuppan Advocate - MKS. RETINAVEL @ S. RATHINAVEL, M.A., B.L.,
Karuppaiah
Pushpa
Muthammal
Rengasamy
Kaliyan
Thangarasu
Hearing History
Judge: 11-DISTRICT MUNSIF-CUM-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VEPPANTHATTAI.
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 17-02-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 03-02-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 28-01-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 12-12-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court at Vepanthattai allowed an Interim Application (I.A. No. 8/2023) filed by the heirs of a deceased plaintiff seeking to amend the case pleadings in Original Case No. 186/2019. The court permitted the amendment in accordance with a previous order dated 09.12.2022 passed in I.A. No. 5/2020, finding the grounds for amendment acceptable and concluding that no prejudice would be caused to the defendants by allowing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court at Vepanthattai allowed an Interim Application (I.A. No. 8/2023) filed by the heirs of a deceased plaintiff seeking to amend the case pleadings in Original Case No. 186/2019. The court permitted the amendment in accordance with a previous order dated 09.12.2022 passed in I.A. No. 5/2020, finding the grounds for amendment acceptable and concluding that no prejudice would be caused to the defendants by allowing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts