State Govt of TN Rep by Inspector of Police, Arumbavoor PS vs Vengatraj — 34/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279, 304(A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNPB060010022023
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
1002/2023
Filing Date
23-06-2023
Registration No
34/2023
Registration Date
23-06-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Veppanthattai
Judge
11-DISTRICT MUNSIF-CUM-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VEPPANTHATTAI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Govt of TN Rep by Inspector of Police, Arumbavoor PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vengatraj
Hearing History
Judge: 11-DISTRICT MUNSIF-CUM-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VEPPANTHATTAI.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 13-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 23-10-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This document records witness depositions in a motor vehicle accident case (CC.34/2023) before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Veppanthattai, heard on 24.04.2025. Three prosecution witnesses testified regarding a fatal accident on 26.01.2022 involving a TVS Excel two-wheeler (TN77A4582) and a TATA ACE vehicle (TN63AD7834), in which one Balasubramanian died. The witnesses corroborated the prosecution's version that the TATA ACE was speeding and negligently driven, causing the collision; the defendant's counsel declined cross-examination of all three witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This document records witness depositions in a motor vehicle accident case (CC.34/2023) before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Veppanthattai, heard on 24.04.2025. Three prosecution witnesses testified regarding a fatal accident on 26.01.2022 involving a TVS Excel two-wheeler (TN77A4582) and a TATA ACE vehicle (TN63AD7834), in which one Balasubramanian died. The witnesses corroborated the prosecution's version that the TATA ACE was speeding and negligently driven, causing the collision; the defendant's counsel declined cross-examination of all three witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts