A. Stella Mary vs V. Murugan Advocate - K. KALIYAPERUMAL, M.A., B.L., — 45/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or 7 rul 1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 05-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNPB060007582024

Filing Number

75/2024

Filing Date

21-Aug-2024

Registration No

45/2024

Registration Date

26-Sep-2024

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Veppanthattai

Judge

11-District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or 7 rul 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A. Stella Mary

    Adv. A. SYED MUSTHAFA, M.E., LLB.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.V. Murugan Advocate - K. KALIYAPERUMAL, M.A., B.L.,

  2. 2.M.Pushpa Rani

    Adv. K. KALIYAPERUMAL, M.A., B.L.,

  3. 3.K.Raja

    Adv. K. KALIYAPERUMAL, M.A., B.L.,

  4. 4.P.Karuppaiya

    Adv. K. KALIYAPERUMAL, M.A., B.L.,

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  9. 11-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  10. 08-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  11. 19-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  12. 28-Oct-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  13. 22-Oct-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  14. 09-Sep-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  15. 20-Aug-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Summary In Civil Case No. 45/2024 before the District Court at Vepanthattai, the plaintiff's witness (PW-1) Stella Mary testified on August 20, 2025. The witness filed her affidavit and submitted documentary evidence including utility bills, Aadhar card, voter ID, complaint memo, promissory notes, and lawyer's notice, which were marked as exhibits. No cross-examination was conducted as the defendant failed to appear and is deemed to have defaulted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 20-Aug-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  17. 13-Jun-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  18. 12-Mar-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  19. 03-Feb-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  20. 31-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  21. 06-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  22. 29-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  23. 28-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  24. 26-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 21-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Civil Case No. 45/2024 before the District Court at Vepanthattai, the plaintiff's witness (PW-1) Stella Mary testified on August 20, 2025. The witness filed her affidavit and submitted documentary evidence including utility bills, Aadhar card, voter ID, complaint memo, promissory notes, and lawyer's notice, which were marked as exhibits. No cross-examination was conducted as the defendant failed to appear and is deemed to have defaulted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case