A. Stella Mary vs V. Murugan Advocate - K. KALIYAPERUMAL, M.A., B.L., — 45/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or 7 rul 1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNPB060007582024

Arguments

Next Hearing

05th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

75/2024

Filing Date

21-08-2024

Registration No

45/2024

Registration Date

26-09-2024

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Veppanthattai

Judge

11-DISTRICT MUNSIF-CUM-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VEPPANTHATTAI.

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section Or 7 rul 1

Petitioner(s)

A. Stella Mary

Adv. A. SYED MUSTHAFA, M.E., LLB.,

Respondent(s)

V. Murugan Advocate - K. KALIYAPERUMAL, M.A., B.L.,

M.Pushpa Rani

Adv. K. KALIYAPERUMAL, M.A., B.L.,

K.Raja

Adv. K. KALIYAPERUMAL, M.A., B.L.,

P.Karuppaiya

Adv. K. KALIYAPERUMAL, M.A., B.L.,

Hearing History

Judge: 11-DISTRICT MUNSIF-CUM-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VEPPANTHATTAI.

06-04-2026

Arguments

09-03-2026

Arguments

18-02-2026

Arguments

09-02-2026

Arguments

06-02-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

20-08-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Summary In Civil Case No. 45/2024 before the District Court at Vepanthattai, the plaintiff's witness (PW-1) Stella Mary testified on August 20, 2025. The witness filed her affidavit and submitted documentary evidence including utility bills, Aadhar card, voter ID, complaint memo, promissory notes, and lawyer's notice, which were marked as exhibits. No cross-examination was conducted as the defendant failed to appear and is deemed to have defaulted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Civil Case No. 45/2024 before the District Court at Vepanthattai, the plaintiff's witness (PW-1) Stella Mary testified on August 20, 2025. The witness filed her affidavit and submitted documentary evidence including utility bills, Aadhar card, voter ID, complaint memo, promissory notes, and lawyer's notice, which were marked as exhibits. No cross-examination was conducted as the defendant failed to appear and is deemed to have defaulted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Veppanthattai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case