State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Kai Kalathur PS vs Ramar — 73/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNPB060006222025
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
e-Filing Number
19-07-2025
Filing Number
562/2025
Filing Date
24-07-2025
Registration No
73/2025
Registration Date
24-07-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Veppanthattai
Judge
11-DISTRICT MUNSIF-CUM-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VEPPANTHATTAI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Kai Kalathur PS (Police Station)
Adv. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KAIKALATHUR PS
Respondent(s)
Ramar
Hearing History
Judge: 11-DISTRICT MUNSIF-CUM-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VEPPANTHATTAI.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 20-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case No: CC.73/2025 | District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Veppanthattai Witness depositions were recorded on 13.11.2025 in a sand mining case involving the accused Raman. Three prosecution witnesses (Selvaraj, Narajan, and Subbramani) testified that they were present when police seized an ox-cart loaded with sand from a river three years prior, though none had direct knowledge of the incident details. During cross-examination, all witnesses admitted limited knowledge of the actual offense and acknowledged signing documents at police request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case No: CC.73/2025 | District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Veppanthattai Witness depositions were recorded on 13.11.2025 in a sand mining case involving the accused Raman. Three prosecution witnesses (Selvaraj, Narajan, and Subbramani) testified that they were present when police seized an ox-cart loaded with sand from a river three years prior, though none had direct knowledge of the incident details. During cross-examination, all witnesses admitted limited knowledge of the actual offense and acknowledged signing documents at police request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts