Thangaraj vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS Advocate - THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, JM COURTS, PERAMBALUR — 35/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPB060002412026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
219/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
35/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Veppanthattai
Judge
11-DISTRICT MUNSIF-CUM-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VEPPANTHATTAI.
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
28
Police Station
POLICE STATION V. KALATHUR PERAMBALUR.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thangaraj
Adv. S. VELMURUGAN
Respondent(s)
State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, JM COURTS, PERAMBALUR
Hearing History
Judge: 11-DISTRICT MUNSIF-CUM-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VEPPANTHATTAI.
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 09-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Veppanthattai, dismissed the bail petition of 68-year-old Thangaraj (accused in Crime No. 28/2026) filed under Section 480 of BNSS Act 2023 for offences under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of BNS. The court rejected bail citing ongoing investigation, the accused's previous criminal history across multiple police stations, and risk of absconding and witness tampering despite 18 days in judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Veppanthattai, dismissed the bail petition of 68-year-old Thangaraj (accused in Crime No. 28/2026) filed under Section 480 of BNSS Act 2023 for offences under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of BNS. The court rejected bail citing ongoing investigation, the accused's previous criminal history across multiple police stations, and risk of absconding and witness tampering despite 18 days in judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts