Maharaja vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS — 29/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPB060002282026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

206/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

29/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Veppanthattai

Judge

11-District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maharaja

    Adv. HARIRAMAN A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court granted bail to accused Maharaja (A3) charged under BNS sections 303(2) and 317(2), finding that he had spent 25 days in judicial custody and most investigation was completed, making police objections unsustainable. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, 15-day police station reporting, non-tampering with witnesses, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Notice

    District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Veppanthattai.

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 29/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court granted bail to accused Maharaja (A3) charged under BNS sections 303(2) and 317(2), finding that he had spent 25 days in judicial custody and most investigation was completed, making police objections unsustainable. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, 15-day police station reporting, non-tampering with witnesses, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case