THANGARASU vs KARTHICK Advocate - EXPARTE — 295/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--Decreed with cost on 30th March 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNPB020091652023
Filing Number
124/2023
Filing Date
01-Sep-2023
Registration No
295/2023
Registration Date
01-Sep-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Perambalur
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed with cost
Last updated 19-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THANGARASU
Adv. D. VISHNUPRIYAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.KARTHICK Advocate - EXPARTE
-
2.THE MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE
Adv. S. VIVEKANANDHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Mar-2026
Orders
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Feb-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
The court judgment concerns a motor vehicle accident case (M.C.O.P. No. 295/2023) heard on February 3, 2026. The petitioner, driving a Volkswagen from Karur to Chennai, applied brakes when another vehicle suddenly crossed a four-way intersection; the other vehicle lost control, struck a barrier causing injury to its driver. The court found the petitioner's statement credible and dismissed the case, holding that the other vehicle's driver was solely responsible for the accident, as the petitioner acted with due care by applying brakes to avoid collision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Feb-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Oct-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Oct-2025
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Sep-2025
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Aug-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Aug-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Jul-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Jul-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jul-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Jun-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Jun-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
22-May-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-May-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Apr-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
17-Apr-2025
Batta
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Apr-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Mar-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Mar-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Feb-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Feb-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
23-Jan-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Dec-2024
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
05-Dec-2024
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Nov-2024
Enquiry
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Nov-2024
Enquiry
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Oct-2024
Enquiry
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Oct-2024
Enquiry
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Sep-2024
Counter
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Aug-2024
Counter
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jul-2024
Counter
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jun-2024
Counter
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jun-2024
Counter
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Apr-2024
Counter
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Mar-2024
Counter
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jan-2024
Counter
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Nov-2023
Counter
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Oct-2023
Counter
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Sep-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 295/2023
The court judgment concerns a motor vehicle accident case (M.C.O.P. No. 295/2023) heard on February 3, 2026. The petitioner, driving a Volkswagen from Karur to Chennai, applied brakes when another vehicle suddenly crossed a four-way intersection; the other vehicle lost control, struck a barrier causing injury to its driver. The court found the petitioner's statement credible and dismissed the case, holding that the other vehicle's driver was solely responsible for the accident, as the petitioner acted with due care by applying brakes to avoid collision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts