State Govt. TN Rep by Inspector Of Police, Kaikalathur vs Seeni Advocate - R. RANJITHKUMAR — 230/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,506(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNPB020064982023
Next Hearing
12th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
6498/2023
Filing Date
27-06-2023
Registration No
230/2023
Registration Date
05-07-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Perambalur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-JM level)
FIR Details
FIR Number
169
Police Station
POLICE STATION K. KALATHUR PERAMBALUR
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Govt. TN Rep by Inspector Of Police, Kaikalathur
Adv. THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, JM COURTS, PERAMBALUR
Respondent(s)
Seeni Advocate - R. RANJITHKUMAR
Selvaraj
Adv. R. RANJITHKUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-JM level)
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Batta
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 29-01-2026 | Batta | |
| 16-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No: CC.230/2023, Additional Mahila Court, Perambalur This is a witness deposition record (not a final judgment) dated 09.03.2026 in a criminal case. A prosecution witness named Prasanth (age 29) testified under oath regarding a land dispute involving multiple parties and allegations concerning use of a wooden stick as a weapon. The witness provided testimony about property ownership, family relationships, and the incident in question, and underwent cross-examination by the defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No: CC.230/2023, Additional Mahila Court, Perambalur This is a witness deposition record (not a final judgment) dated 09.03.2026 in a criminal case. A prosecution witness named Prasanth (age 29) testified under oath regarding a land dispute involving multiple parties and allegations concerning use of a wooden stick as a weapon. The witness provided testimony about property ownership, family relationships, and the incident in question, and underwent cross-examination by the defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts