Robert vs Mohamed kasim — 61/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Service Pending-Summon. Next hearing: 27th May 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNPB020051252025

Service Pending-Summon

Next Hearing

27th May 2026

e-Filing Number

22-12-2025

Filing Number

4820/2025

Filing Date

24-12-2025

Registration No

61/2026

Registration Date

03-02-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Perambalur

Judge

6-Judicial Magistrate, No. I

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Robert

Adv. Shanmugasundaram P

Respondent(s)

Mohamed kasim

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Judicial Magistrate, No. I

29-04-2026

Service Pending-Summon

11-03-2026

Service Pending-Summon

27-02-2026

Sworn Statement

04-02-2026

Sworn Statement

03-02-2026

Appearance

Interim Orders

11-03-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

This is a deposition of witness document from Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Perambalur dated 11/03/2026 in case STC No. 61/2026. The witness testified regarding a complaint filed against the accused on 30.06.2022 (later dated 03.11.2025) with reference number 000552, and confirmed the authenticity of the deposition and supporting documents including bank return memo and legal notices. The deposition was recorded in open court, read over to the witness in the presence of the accused/pleader, and admitted to be correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a deposition of witness document from Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Perambalur dated 11/03/2026 in case STC No. 61/2026. The witness testified regarding a complaint filed against the accused on 30.06.2022 (later dated 03.11.2025) with reference number 000552, and confirmed the authenticity of the deposition and supporting documents including bank return memo and legal notices. The deposition was recorded in open court, read over to the witness in the presence of the accused/pleader, and admitted to be correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Perambalur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case