Ashabe vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Mangalamedu PS Advocate - THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, JM COURTS, PERAMBALUR — 2010/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 258and468(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 13th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPB020046802025
Filing Number
4406/2025
Filing Date
28-11-2025
Registration No
2010/2025
Registration Date
28-11-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Perambalur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-JM level)
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashabe
Adv. S. SENTHILKUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Mangalamedu PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, JM COURTS, PERAMBALUR
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-JM level)
Disposed
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Await Reports |
| 27-02-2026 | Await Reports |
| 20-02-2026 | Await Reports |
| 13-02-2026 | Await Reports |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional District Court of Perambalur dismissed the petition seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 22/2015 against Asha B. The court held that since the case involves charges under IPC Section 354 (outraging modesty), which carries up to 5 years imprisonment, it falls outside the 3-year limitation period under CrPC Section 468(2), and therefore the case cannot be quashed on limitation grounds. The court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in *Ghanshyam Soni v. State NCT Delhi*, establishing that the limitation period for quashing is calculated from the date of filing the complaint, not from when cognizance is taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional District Court of Perambalur dismissed the petition seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 22/2015 against Asha B. The court held that since the case involves charges under IPC Section 354 (outraging modesty), which carries up to 5 years imprisonment, it falls outside the 3-year limitation period under CrPC Section 468(2), and therefore the case cannot be quashed on limitation grounds. The court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in *Ghanshyam Soni v. State NCT Delhi*, establishing that the limitation period for quashing is calculated from the date of filing the complaint, not from when cognizance is taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts