Ashabe vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Mangalamedu PS Advocate - THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, JM COURTS, PERAMBALUR — 2010/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 258and468(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 13th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPB020046802025

Case disposed

Filing Number

4406/2025

Filing Date

28-11-2025

Registration No

2010/2025

Registration Date

28-11-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Perambalur

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-JM level)

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 258and468(2)

Petitioner(s)

Ashabe

Adv. S. SENTHILKUMAR

Respondent(s)

State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Mangalamedu PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, JM COURTS, PERAMBALUR

Hearing History

Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-JM level)

13-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Await Reports

27-02-2026

Await Reports

20-02-2026

Await Reports

13-02-2026

Await Reports

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Court Decision Summary The Additional District Court of Perambalur dismissed the petition seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 22/2015 against Asha B. The court held that since the case involves charges under IPC Section 354 (outraging modesty), which carries up to 5 years imprisonment, it falls outside the 3-year limitation period under CrPC Section 468(2), and therefore the case cannot be quashed on limitation grounds. The court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in *Ghanshyam Soni v. State NCT Delhi*, establishing that the limitation period for quashing is calculated from the date of filing the complaint, not from when cognizance is taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional District Court of Perambalur dismissed the petition seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 22/2015 against Asha B. The court held that since the case involves charges under IPC Section 354 (outraging modesty), which carries up to 5 years imprisonment, it falls outside the 3-year limitation period under CrPC Section 468(2), and therefore the case cannot be quashed on limitation grounds. The court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in *Ghanshyam Soni v. State NCT Delhi*, establishing that the limitation period for quashing is calculated from the date of filing the complaint, not from when cognizance is taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Perambalur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case