Repco Home Finance Limited, Authorized Officer, V. Gomathi Sankar vs S MANIKANDAN — 1819/2025
Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section Section14. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPB020035912025
e-Filing Number
24-07-2025
Filing Number
3390/2025
Filing Date
12-09-2025
Registration No
1819/2025
Registration Date
04-11-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Perambalur
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Repco Home Finance Limited, Authorized Officer, V. Gomathi Sankar
Adv. TAMILNILAVAN
Respondent(s)
S MANIKANDAN
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Await Reports |
| 06-03-2026 | Await Reports |
| 06-02-2026 | Await Reports |
| 02-01-2026 | Await Reports |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Perambalur allowed REPCO Home Finance Limited's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 to take physical possession of mortgaged property from borrowers who defaulted on a ₹13,00,000 home loan. The court found the bank complied with all mandatory requirements, including serving demand notices and publishing notices in newspapers, and appointed an Advocate Commissioner to assist in taking possession of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Perambalur allowed REPCO Home Finance Limited's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 to take physical possession of mortgaged property from borrowers who defaulted on a ₹13,00,000 home loan. The court found the bank complied with all mandatory requirements, including serving demand notices and publishing notices in newspapers, and appointed an Advocate Commissioner to assist in taking possession of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts