State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Kunnam PS vs Palanivel — 432/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,294(b),342,323,506(i). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNPB020014142025
Filing Number
1342/2025
Filing Date
29-Apr-2025
Registration No
432/2025
Registration Date
29-Apr-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Perambalur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 19-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
801
Police Station
POLICE STATION KUNNAM PERAMBALUR.
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Kunnam PS (Police Station)
Adv. THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, JM COURTS, PERAMBALUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Palanivel
-
2.Kalaiselvan
-
3.Sathiyamoorth
-
4.Sellammal
-
5.Manickam
-
6.Dhanapal
-
7.Ranjith(Absconding)
-
8.Raja(Absconding)
-
9.Mohandos(Absconding)
-
10.Ramakannu
-
11.Kumar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Additional Mahila Court, Perambalur acquitted all 11 accused persons (Palanivel, Kalaiselvan, Sathyamoorthy, Chellammal, Manickam, Dhanapal, Ramakannu, and Kumar) charged under IPC sections 148, 294(b), 342, 323, 506(1) and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the government witnesses gave inconsistent statements that did not sufficiently establish the allegations of unlawful assembly, criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, and harassment of the female complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
01-Apr-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
26-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
23-Mar-2026
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
16-Mar-2026
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
11-Mar-2026
Copies
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
04-Mar-2026
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
24-Feb-2026
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
12-Dec-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
19-Nov-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
25-Oct-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
10-Oct-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
15-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
08-Aug-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
06-Aug-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
21-Jul-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
14-Jul-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
30-Jun-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
16-Jun-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
30-May-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
20-May-2025
Await Reports
Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)
-
29-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 432/2025
Court Decision Summary The Additional Mahila Court, Perambalur acquitted all 11 accused persons (Palanivel, Kalaiselvan, Sathyamoorthy, Chellammal, Manickam, Dhanapal, Ramakannu, and Kumar) charged under IPC sections 148, 294(b), 342, 323, 506(1) and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the government witnesses gave inconsistent statements that did not sufficiently establish the allegations of unlawful assembly, criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, and harassment of the female complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts