Ravichandran vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Sub Inspector of Police, Arumbavur Police Station Advocate - T. SENTHIL — 346/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 320(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPB020008422026

Filing Number

759/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

346/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Perambalur

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 320(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ravichandran

    Adv. T. SENTHIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Sub Inspector of Police, Arumbavur Police Station Advocate - T. SENTHIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Additional Mahila Court, Perambalur dismissed the compromise petition filed by accused Ravichandran and Kasthuri, holding that most of the alleged offences (rioting, criminal intimidation, harassment of women) are non-compoundable under Section 320 CrPC and therefore cannot be settled through compromise at the magistrate level. The court directed the parties to approach the High Court under Section 482 CrPC if they seek case closure on the basis of compromise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 346/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Mahila Court, Perambalur dismissed the compromise petition filed by accused Ravichandran and Kasthuri, holding that most of the alleged offences (rioting, criminal intimidation, harassment of women) are non-compoundable under Section 320 CrPC and therefore cannot be settled through compromise at the magistrate level. The court directed the parties to approach the High Court under Section 482 CrPC if they seek case closure on the basis of compromise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case