Rajesh vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS Advocate - THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, JM COURTS, PERAMBALUR — 302/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPB020007622026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

683/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

302/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Perambalur

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajesh

    Adv. PANNER SELVAM P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, JM COURTS, PERAMBALUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Additional Mahila Court, Perambalur granted bail to the accused Rajes under Section 480 BNSS Act, 2023, who was charged with offences under Sections 115(2), 296(b), 351(2), and 74 BNS Act. The court considered that the accused had been in judicial custody for 8 days, the victim was discharged from hospital, and imposed conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police station reporting for 15 days, and prohibition on witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-Jm level)

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 302/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Mahila Court, Perambalur granted bail to the accused Rajes under Section 480 BNSS Act, 2023, who was charged with offences under Sections 115(2), 296(b), 351(2), and 74 BNS Act. The court considered that the accused had been in judicial custody for 8 days, the victim was discharged from hospital, and imposed conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police station reporting for 15 days, and prohibition on witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case