Ganesan vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police CBCID PERAMBALUR — 316/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 187(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPB020007612026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

682/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

316/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Perambalur

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 187(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ganesan

    Adv. S SENTHILKUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police CBCID PERAMBALUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Judicature at Madras granted bail to the accused (petitioner/5th accused) in a criminal case involving charges under IPC sections 120(B), 420, 465, 468, 471, and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNSS) section 187(3). The court found that the improper application of CrPC section 167(2) instead of BNSS section 187(3) warranted bail, and ordered the accused's release on bail of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of the same amount, subject to strict conditions including daily police station reporting and residence restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 316/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Judicature at Madras granted bail to the accused (petitioner/5th accused) in a criminal case involving charges under IPC sections 120(B), 420, 465, 468, 471, and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNSS) section 187(3). The court found that the improper application of CrPC section 167(2) instead of BNSS section 187(3) warranted bail, and ordered the accused's release on bail of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of the same amount, subject to strict conditions including daily police station reporting and residence restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case