Sathishkumar vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS Advocate - THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, JM COURTS, PERAMBALUR — 286/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPB020007302026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
651/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
286/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Perambalur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-JM level)
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sathishkumar
Adv. P ELAMAISELVAN
Respondent(s)
State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, JM COURTS, PERAMBALUR
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila Court-JM level)
Disposed
Orders
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-03-2026 | Orders |
| 03-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Mahila Court, Perambalur granted bail to Sathishkumar, accused of offences under sections 115(2), 296(b), 351(2), and 74 of the BNS Act, after he spent 7 days in judicial custody. The court considered the nature of offences, the accused's clean record, no flight risk, and the victim's hospital discharge, imposing conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police station attendance for 15 days, and non-tampering of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Mahila Court, Perambalur granted bail to Sathishkumar, accused of offences under sections 115(2), 296(b), 351(2), and 74 of the BNS Act, after he spent 7 days in judicial custody. The court considered the nature of offences, the accused's clean record, no flight risk, and the victim's hospital discharge, imposing conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police station attendance for 15 days, and non-tampering of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts