Elamurugan vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS — 284/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPB020007072026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
628/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
284/2026
Registration Date
03-Mar-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Perambalur
Judge
6-Judicial Magistrate, No. I
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
109
Police Station
POLICE STATION PERMBALUR.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Elamurugan
Adv. M Aravinth
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS (Police Station)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
The court granted the petitioner's plea to release his vehicle (a tipper lorry registered as TN 09 CR 6721) pending trial in a criminal case under Section 303(2) BNS and Section 21(1) MM&DR Act, subject to conditions including a bond of ₹2,00,000, payment of ₹10,000 to legal aid, and proper documentation. The court found that detaining the vehicle caused undue hardship to the petitioner and noted the vehicle belonged to him as evidenced by available documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate, No. I
-
09-Mar-2026
Await Reports
Judicial Magistrate, No. I
-
04-Mar-2026
Await Reports
Judicial Magistrate, No. I
-
03-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 284/2026
The court granted the petitioner's plea to release his vehicle (a tipper lorry registered as TN 09 CR 6721) pending trial in a criminal case under Section 303(2) BNS and Section 21(1) MM&DR Act, subject to conditions including a bond of ₹2,00,000, payment of ₹10,000 to legal aid, and proper documentation. The court found that detaining the vehicle caused undue hardship to the petitioner and noted the vehicle belonged to him as evidenced by available documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts