Vimalaraj vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS Advocate - THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, JM COURTS, PERAMBALUR — 214/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497and503. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPB020005732026
e-Filing Number
17-02-2026
Filing Number
521/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
214/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Perambalur
Judge
6-Judicial Magistrate, No. I
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
POLICE STATION PERMBALUR.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vimalaraj
Adv. DHINESH A S
Respondent(s)
State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, JM COURTS, PERAMBALUR
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Judicial Magistrate, No. I
Disposed
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-04-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 24-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 18-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 16-03-2026 | Await Reports |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate Court at Perambalur allowed Vimalraj's petition seeking interim custody of his seized Mahendra Xylo vehicle (Reg. No. TN 45 BH 7351), rejecting the prosecution's objections. The court reasoned that prolonged storage would deteriorate the vehicle's engine and reduce its value, applying Supreme Court guidelines from Sundarbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat. The vehicle was released to the petitioner under interim custody subject to executing a personal bond of Rs. 2 lakhs with two sureties and furnishing vehicle documentation and photographs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate Court at Perambalur allowed Vimalraj's petition seeking interim custody of his seized Mahendra Xylo vehicle (Reg. No. TN 45 BH 7351), rejecting the prosecution's objections. The court reasoned that prolonged storage would deteriorate the vehicle's engine and reduce its value, applying Supreme Court guidelines from Sundarbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat. The vehicle was released to the petitioner under interim custody subject to executing a personal bond of Rs. 2 lakhs with two sureties and furnishing vehicle documentation and photographs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts