State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS vs Rajeev (Dalda kannan) — 53/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNPB020003092025

e-Filing Number

23-01-2025

Filing Number

297/2025

Filing Date

12-Feb-2025

Registration No

53/2025

Registration Date

17-Feb-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Perambalur

Judge

6-Judicial Magistrate, No. I

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

661

Police Station

POLICE STATION PERMBALUR.

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4)
Mp/1/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Rajeev (Dalda kannan)State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS
Mp/2/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Rajeev (Dalda kannan)State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS
Mp/3/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Rajeev (Dalda kannan)State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS
Mp/4/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS
Mp/5/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Rajeev (Dalda kannan)State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS
Mp/6/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Rajeev (Dalda kannan)State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS (Police Station)

    Adv. THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, JM COURTS, PERAMBALUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajeev (Dalda kannan)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Perambalur acquitted two accused persons (Rajeev @ Dalda Kannan and Santhoshkumar) of charges under IPC Section 309(4) (dacoity with attempt to cause death or grievous hurt), finding that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the sole eyewitness (complainant) gave contradictory statements, while other prosecution witnesses either retracted their confessional statements or provided testimony inconsistent with the charges, resulting in insufficient evidence to prove guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  9. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  10. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  11. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  12. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  13. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  14. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  15. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  16. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  17. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  18. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  19. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  20. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  21. 04-Jun-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  22. 04-Jun-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  23. 04-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  24. 21-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  25. 08-May-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  26. 07-May-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  27. 23-Apr-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  28. 18-Mar-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  29. 17-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 12-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 53/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Perambalur acquitted two accused persons (Rajeev @ Dalda Kannan and Santhoshkumar) of charges under IPC Section 309(4) (dacoity with attempt to cause death or grievous hurt), finding that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the sole eyewitness (complainant) gave contradictory statements, while other prosecution witnesses either retracted their confessional statements or provided testimony inconsistent with the charges, resulting in insufficient evidence to prove guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case