State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS vs Rajeev (Dalda Kanna) — 52/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th May 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 27-May-2026

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNPB020003082025

e-Filing Number

30-01-2025

Filing Number

296/2025

Filing Date

12-Feb-2025

Registration No

52/2025

Registration Date

17-Feb-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Perambalur

Judge

6-Judicial Magistrate, No. I

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

19

Police Station

POLICE STATION PERMBALUR.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4)
Mp/2/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Rajeev (Dalda Kanna)State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS
Mp/3/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Rajeev (Dalda Kanna)State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS
Mp/4/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Rajeev (Dalda Kanna)State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS (Police Station)

    Adv. THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, JM COURTS, PERAMBALUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajeev (Dalda Kanna)

Case History

  1. 27-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Summary: In Criminal Case No. 52/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Perambalur, the deposition of prosecution witness Anandan (PW-3) was recorded on 25.03.2026. The witness testified regarding an alleged robbery incident and identified the accused. During cross-examination by the defense, the witness admitted to giving false testimony to protect the accused, and the court allowed the defense to proceed with cross-examination accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  10. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  11. 11-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  12. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  13. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  14. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  15. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  16. 07-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  17. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  18. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  19. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  20. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  21. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  22. 04-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  23. 21-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  24. 08-May-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  25. 07-May-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  26. 23-Apr-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  27. 18-Mar-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate, No. I

  28. 17-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 12-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 52/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Criminal Case No. 52/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Perambalur, the deposition of prosecution witness Anandan (PW-3) was recorded on 25.03.2026. The witness testified regarding an alleged robbery incident and identified the accused. During cross-examination by the defense, the witness admitted to giving false testimony to protect the accused, and the court allowed the defense to proceed with cross-examination accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case