Sakthivel vs Kalaiselvan Advocate - M. SARAVANAN — 334/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--Decreed with cost on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNPB020001352025

Filing Number

10/2025

Filing Date

17-Dec-2024

Registration No

334/2024

Registration Date

20-Dec-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Perambalur

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed with cost

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sakthivel

    Adv. C. VELUSAMY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kalaiselvan Advocate - M. SARAVANAN

  2. 2.Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

    Adv. C. JEYACHANDRAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 30-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 25-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 18-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 13-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 30-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 16-Oct-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 09-Oct-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 21-Aug-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 07-Aug-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 22-Jul-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 08-Jul-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 24-Jun-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    This is a Tamil-language motor vehicle accident case (MCOP No. 334/2024) involving a two-wheeler and car collision on 02.11.2024. The court found that the two-wheeler rider (witness Saktivel) was solely responsible for the accident, as he was operating the vehicle without a valid driver's license at the time, and the car owner cannot be held liable for compensation as the accident resulted from the rider's own negligence and lack of proper licensing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  23. 24-Jun-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 05-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 22-May-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 06-May-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 22-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 08-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 27-Mar-2025

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 04-Mar-2025

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  32. 18-Feb-2025

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 30-Jan-2025

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 22-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 17-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 334/2024

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Tamil-language motor vehicle accident case (MCOP No. 334/2024) involving a two-wheeler and car collision on 02.11.2024. The court found that the two-wheeler rider (witness Saktivel) was solely responsible for the accident, as he was operating the vehicle without a valid driver's license at the time, and the car owner cannot be held liable for compensation as the accident resulted from the rider's own negligence and lack of proper licensing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case