Kavitha (Diabled person) NF Anbazhagan vs Kathiravan — 61/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Ord7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNPB010065802024
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
669/2024
Filing Date
16-11-2024
Registration No
61/2024
Registration Date
21-11-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Perambalur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kavitha (Diabled person) NF Anbazhagan
Adv. G. SUBRAMANIAN, M.A., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Kathiravan
Ayyammal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this OS.No.61/2024 before the Principal District Court, Perambalur (dated 15.04.2026), the court examined witness PW2-Muthusamy's cross-examination testimony regarding property ownership disputes. The court found that the plaintiff Kavitha's claim to have purchased property in 2012 was contradicted by the defendant's evidence, and determined that the plaintiff's disability status and property rights required further substantiation through documentary evidence. The matter appears to be under examination with the court noting credibility issues and directing that evidence regarding ancestral property ownership and transaction details be properly established before final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this OS.No.61/2024 before the Principal District Court, Perambalur (dated 15.04.2026), the court examined witness PW2-Muthusamy's cross-examination testimony regarding property ownership disputes. The court found that the plaintiff Kavitha's claim to have purchased property in 2012 was contradicted by the defendant's evidence, and determined that the plaintiff's disability status and property rights required further substantiation through documentary evidence. The matter appears to be under examination with the court noting credibility issues and directing that evidence regarding ancestral property ownership and transaction details be properly established before final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts