PREMA vs KRISHNAMOORTHY — 156/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNPB010017732025
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
e-Filing Number
16-07-2025
Filing Number
349/2025
Filing Date
17-07-2025
Registration No
156/2025
Registration Date
17-07-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Perambalur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PREMA
Adv. VISHNUPRIYAN D
RAJINI
Adv. VISHNUPRIYAN D
MINOR POOVARASAN (For Minor Gaurdian Mother Prema)
Adv. VISHNUPRIYAN D
Respondent(s)
KRISHNAMOORTHY
THE MANAGER THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Adv. R. MANIVANNAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Part Heard
Part Heard
Enquiry
Counter
Counter
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 19-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 08-01-2026 | Enquiry |
| 20-11-2025 | Counter |
| 09-10-2025 | Counter |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: MCOP. No.156/2025 Court: Principal District Court, Perambalur Date: February 19, 2026 The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of the second witness (PW.2) under Section 54(9) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness testimony regarding a fatal accident involving a heavy vehicle has been recorded, with the witness testifying about the circumstances of the incident. No further re-examination was required, and the proceedings were concluded by Principal District Judge V. Padmanabhan. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: MCOP. No.156/2025 Court: Principal District Court, Perambalur Date: February 19, 2026 The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of the second witness (PW.2) under Section 54(9) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness testimony regarding a fatal accident involving a heavy vehicle has been recorded, with the witness testifying about the circumstances of the incident. No further re-examination was required, and the proceedings were concluded by Principal District Judge V. Padmanabhan. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts