Krishnamoorthy vs K Kali Chettiyar Sons Advocate - E. VALLUVAN NAMBI — 10/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNPB010017232025
e-Filing Number
09-07-2025
Filing Number
336/2025
Filing Date
11-07-2025
Registration No
10/2025
Registration Date
03-09-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Perambalur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Krishnamoorthy
Adv. BALASUBRAMANIAN R
Respondent(s)
K Kali Chettiyar Sons Advocate - E. VALLUVAN NAMBI
Tamilselvi
Adv. R. MUTHAMIL SELVAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Disposed
Orders
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | Orders |
| 23-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 17-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 09-02-2026 | IA Pending |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Principal District Judge of Perambalur allowed a transfer petition (O.P. No. 10/2025) and ordered that civil suits O.S. No. 150/2016 and 156/2020 pending in the Additional District Civil Court be transferred to the Principal District Court to be consolidated and heard together with related suits O.S. No. 49/2023, 52/2023, and 36/2025. The court reasoned that consolidating these interconnected property disputes would prevent conflicting judgments, reduce litigation burden, and ensure fair adjudication of the parties' rights in the inherited property matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Principal District Judge of Perambalur allowed a transfer petition (O.P. No. 10/2025) and ordered that civil suits O.S. No. 150/2016 and 156/2020 pending in the Additional District Civil Court be transferred to the Principal District Court to be consolidated and heard together with related suits O.S. No. 49/2023, 52/2023, and 36/2025. The court reasoned that consolidating these interconnected property disputes would prevent conflicting judgments, reduce litigation burden, and ensure fair adjudication of the parties' rights in the inherited property matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts