Maharuinisha vs Sarathkumar — 267/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 26-Mar-2026

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNPB010012832024

e-Filing Number

14-06-2024

Filing Number

340/2024

Filing Date

19-Jun-2024

Registration No

267/2024

Registration Date

15-Oct-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Perambalur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maharuinisha

    Adv. K ANANDAN

  2. 2.Madhina Parveen

    Adv. K ANANDAN

  3. 3.Hakeem Mohamed

    Adv. K ANANDAN

  4. 4.Farzana Fathima

    Adv. K ANANDAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sarathkumar

Case History

  1. 26-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  3. 19-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  4. 05-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Summary: This is a civil case (MCOP No.267/2024) from the Principal District Court, Perambalur, heard on February 5, 2026. The court recorded the examination-in-chief of witness XW.1, a medical college official, who testified regarding medical treatment records and bills totaling ₹66,946 provided to a patient who was admitted on 31.01.2024 and died on 03.02.2024. The defendant's cross-examination revealed that the deceased patient was initially treated at KMC hospital in Trichy before being referred for further treatment, with some bills recorded as credit entries. The court concluded with no re-examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  8. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  9. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  10. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  11. 23-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  12. 25-Sep-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  13. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  14. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  15. 31-Jul-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  16. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  17. 03-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  18. 12-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  19. 15-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  20. 13-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  21. 18-Feb-2025

    Counter

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  22. 21-Jan-2025

    Counter

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  23. 12-Dec-2024

    Counter

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  24. 21-Nov-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  25. 15-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 19-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 267/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a civil case (MCOP No.267/2024) from the Principal District Court, Perambalur, heard on February 5, 2026. The court recorded the examination-in-chief of witness XW.1, a medical college official, who testified regarding medical treatment records and bills totaling ₹66,946 provided to a patient who was admitted on 31.01.2024 and died on 03.02.2024. The defendant's cross-examination revealed that the deceased patient was initially treated at KMC hospital in Trichy before being referred for further treatment, with some bills recorded as credit entries. The court concluded with no re-examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case