Murugesan vs State Govt Of Tamil Nadu Rep By Sub Inspector Of Police Arumbavoor P.S. Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, PDC, PERAMBALUR — 16/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(3)(a). Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 30th March 2026.
CRLA - Criminal Appeal
CNR: TNPB010011892024
e-Filing Number
06-06-2024
Filing Number
863/2024
Filing Date
07-Jun-2024
Registration No
16/2024
Registration Date
10-Jul-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Perambalur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Partially Allowed
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1144
Police Station
POLICE STATION, ARUMBAVUR, PERMBALUR.
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Murugesan
Adv. S. SATHISH, B.A., B.L.,
-
2.Kaviyarasan
Adv. S. SATHISH, B.A., B.L.,
-
3.Prabhu @ Pandu
Adv. S. SATHISH, B.A., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Govt Of Tamil Nadu Rep By Sub Inspector Of Police Arumbavoor P.S. Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, PDC, PERAMBALUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur, partly allowed the criminal appeal by confirming the conviction of three accused under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene language) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) for assaulting a food vendor on 23.11.2020, but reduced the sentence for section 323 from 3 months to 1 month imprisonment. The court rejected the appellants' arguments regarding lack of cross-examination opportunity and found the eyewitness testimony credible and trustworthy, with medical evidence corroborating the injuries sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
17-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
09-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
07-Jan-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
27-Nov-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
24-Oct-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
17-Sep-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
13-Aug-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
11-Jul-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
20-Jun-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
03-Jun-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
16-Apr-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
01-Apr-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
14-Mar-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
21-Feb-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
24-Jan-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
08-Jan-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
11-Dec-2024
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
27-Nov-2024
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
28-Oct-2024
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
16-Oct-2024
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
25-Sep-2024
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
06-Sep-2024
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
27-Aug-2024
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
07-Aug-2024
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
22-Jul-2024
For further Proceedings
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
12-Jul-2024
Await Records
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
10-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 16/2024
The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur, partly allowed the criminal appeal by confirming the conviction of three accused under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene language) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) for assaulting a food vendor on 23.11.2020, but reduced the sentence for section 323 from 3 months to 1 month imprisonment. The court rejected the appellants' arguments regarding lack of cross-examination opportunity and found the eyewitness testimony credible and trustworthy, with medical evidence corroborating the injuries sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts