Murugesan vs State Govt Of Tamil Nadu Rep By Sub Inspector Of Police Arumbavoor P.S. Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, PDC, PERAMBALUR — 16/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(3)(a). Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 30th March 2026.
CRLA - Criminal Appeal
CNR: TNPB010011892024
e-Filing Number
06-06-2024
Filing Number
863/2024
Filing Date
07-06-2024
Registration No
16/2024
Registration Date
10-07-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Perambalur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Partially Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
1144
Police Station
POLICE STATION, ARUMBAVUR, PERMBALUR.
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Murugesan
Adv. S. SATHISH, B.A., B.L.,
Kaviyarasan
Adv. S. SATHISH, B.A., B.L.,
Prabhu @ Pandu
Adv. S. SATHISH, B.A., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
State Govt Of Tamil Nadu Rep By Sub Inspector Of Police Arumbavoor P.S. Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, PDC, PERAMBALUR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-01-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur, partly allowed the criminal appeal by confirming the conviction of three accused under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene language) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) for assaulting a food vendor on 23.11.2020, but reduced the sentence for section 323 from 3 months to 1 month imprisonment. The court rejected the appellants' arguments regarding lack of cross-examination opportunity and found the eyewitness testimony credible and trustworthy, with medical evidence corroborating the injuries sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur, partly allowed the criminal appeal by confirming the conviction of three accused under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene language) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) for assaulting a food vendor on 23.11.2020, but reduced the sentence for section 323 from 3 months to 1 month imprisonment. The court rejected the appellants' arguments regarding lack of cross-examination opportunity and found the eyewitness testimony credible and trustworthy, with medical evidence corroborating the injuries sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts