Seeralan vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Kai Kalathur PS Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR — 282/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPB010004592026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

312/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

282/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Perambalur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

22

Police Station

POLICE STATION, K. KALATHUR, PERAMBALUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Seeralan

    Adv. ARUNKUMAR D

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Kai Kalathur PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the bail petition of accused Seeralan (A2) in a case involving allegations of assault, abetment to suicide, and related offenses under BNS sections. The court found the serious nature of the charges—including public assault, dress-tearing, and death threats that allegedly drove two women to consume pesticide—warrant continued custody during the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 282/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the bail petition of accused Seeralan (A2) in a case involving allegations of assault, abetment to suicide, and related offenses under BNS sections. The court found the serious nature of the charges—including public assault, dress-tearing, and death threats that allegedly drove two women to consume pesticide—warrant continued custody during the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case