Rajendran vs Sandha Alice Chandira — 271/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPB010004442026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
303/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
271/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Perambalur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
POLICE STATION, K. KALATHUR, PERAMBALUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajendran
Adv. Rajkumar M Advocate
Respondent(s)
Sandha Alice Chandira
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Disposed
Appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur dismissed the bail petition of accused Santha @ Chandira, holding that considering the serious nature of the alleged offences (assault, public humiliation, and abetment of suicide), the stage of investigation, and the absence of changed circumstances, bail could not be granted at that stage. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused, due to previous enmity, assaulted the deceased persons and tore the victim's dress in public, thereby instigating them to consume pesticide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur dismissed the bail petition of accused Santha @ Chandira, holding that considering the serious nature of the alleged offences (assault, public humiliation, and abetment of suicide), the stage of investigation, and the absence of changed circumstances, bail could not be granted at that stage. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused, due to previous enmity, assaulted the deceased persons and tore the victim's dress in public, thereby instigating them to consume pesticide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts