Rajendran vs Sandha Alice Chandira — 271/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPB010004442026

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

303/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

271/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Perambalur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

22

Police Station

POLICE STATION, K. KALATHUR, PERAMBALUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajendran

    Adv. Rajkumar M Advocate

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sandha Alice Chandira

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur dismissed the bail petition of accused Santha @ Chandira, holding that considering the serious nature of the alleged offences (assault, public humiliation, and abetment of suicide), the stage of investigation, and the absence of changed circumstances, bail could not be granted at that stage. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused, due to previous enmity, assaulted the deceased persons and tore the victim's dress in public, thereby instigating them to consume pesticide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 271/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur dismissed the bail petition of accused Santha @ Chandira, holding that considering the serious nature of the alleged offences (assault, public humiliation, and abetment of suicide), the stage of investigation, and the absence of changed circumstances, bail could not be granted at that stage. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused, due to previous enmity, assaulted the deceased persons and tore the victim's dress in public, thereby instigating them to consume pesticide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case