Pandiyan vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Maruvathur PS Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR — 275/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPB010004432026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
302/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
275/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Perambalur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
35
Police Station
POLICE STATION, MARUVATHUR, PERAMBALUR.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pandiyan
Adv. Dhinesh Kumar
Respondent(s)
State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Maruvathur PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | Appearance | |
| 09-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Perambalur granted anticipatory bail to Pandiyan, accused of illegally transporting rough stones under Sections 303(2) BNS and 21(4) MMDR Act. The court found that case property was recovered, the petitioner had a valid permit, possessed no prior criminal history, and witnesses were government officials unlikely to be tampered with. Bail was granted on conditions including a ₹10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 3 weeks, and prohibition on tampering with evidence or absconding, with automatic cancellation if not surrendered within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Perambalur granted anticipatory bail to Pandiyan, accused of illegally transporting rough stones under Sections 303(2) BNS and 21(4) MMDR Act. The court found that case property was recovered, the petitioner had a valid permit, possessed no prior criminal history, and witnesses were government officials unlikely to be tampered with. Bail was granted on conditions including a ₹10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 3 weeks, and prohibition on tampering with evidence or absconding, with automatic cancellation if not surrendered within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts