Ajith Alias Ajithkumar vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur RURAL PS Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR — 274/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPB010004422026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

301/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

274/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Perambalur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Ajith Alias Ajithkumar

Adv. Rajkumar M Advocate

Ragu Alias Ragunath

Adv. Rajkumar M Advocate

Respondent(s)

State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur RURAL PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

11-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Perambalur granted anticipatory bail to two accused (Ajith and Ragu) charged under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), and 303(2) for alleged extortion and wrongful restraint. The court found no prior criminal history, no hospitalization of the victim, and weak prosecution grounds beyond a pending investigation, thus releasing them on bail with conditions including Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, daily police reporting for three weeks, and restrictions on absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Perambalur granted anticipatory bail to two accused (Ajith and Ragu) charged under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), and 303(2) for alleged extortion and wrongful restraint. The court found no prior criminal history, no hospitalization of the victim, and weak prosecution grounds beyond a pending investigation, thus releasing them on bail with conditions including Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, daily police reporting for three weeks, and restrictions on absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Perambalur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case