Ajith Alias Ajithkumar vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur RURAL PS Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR — 274/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPB010004422026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
301/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
274/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Perambalur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ajith Alias Ajithkumar
Adv. Rajkumar M Advocate
-
2.Ragu Alias Ragunath
Adv. Rajkumar M Advocate
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur RURAL PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Perambalur granted anticipatory bail to two accused (Ajith and Ragu) charged under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), and 303(2) for alleged extortion and wrongful restraint. The court found no prior criminal history, no hospitalization of the victim, and weak prosecution grounds beyond a pending investigation, thus releasing them on bail with conditions including Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, daily police reporting for three weeks, and restrictions on absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 274/2026
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Perambalur granted anticipatory bail to two accused (Ajith and Ragu) charged under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), and 303(2) for alleged extortion and wrongful restraint. The court found no prior criminal history, no hospitalization of the victim, and weak prosecution grounds beyond a pending investigation, thus releasing them on bail with conditions including Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, daily police reporting for three weeks, and restrictions on absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts