Panneerselvam vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR — 273/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPB010004412026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
300/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
273/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Perambalur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
33
Police Station
POLICE STATION, V. KALATHUR, PERAMBALUR.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Panneerselvam
Adv. Rajkumar M Advocate
Respondent(s)
State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | Appearance | |
| 09-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Perambalur granted bail to Panneerselvam, accused of possessing 19.250 kg of prohibited tobacco products under COTPA Act, after he spent 22 days in judicial custody. The court found changed circumstances warranting release on bail with conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 3 weeks, and prohibition against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Perambalur granted bail to Panneerselvam, accused of possessing 19.250 kg of prohibited tobacco products under COTPA Act, after he spent 22 days in judicial custody. The court found changed circumstances warranting release on bail with conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 3 weeks, and prohibition against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts