Muthu vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police All Women PS Perambalur Advocate - THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MAHILA COURT PERAMBALUR — 259/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPB010004222026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

291/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

259/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Perambalur

Judge

2-Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Muthu

Adv. T. SENTHIL

Respondent(s)

State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police All Women PS (Police Station) Perambalur Advocate - THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MAHILA COURT PERAMBALUR

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Await Reports

05-03-2026

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

The Mahila Court, Perambalur granted bail to the accused (Muthu, age 52) in a POCSO Act case involving his daughter, despite the serious allegations and the prosecution's strong objections. The court imposed stringent bail conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily court appearances, and restrictions against threatening the victim or tampering with witnesses, considering the accused's 77-day remand period and the charge sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Mahila Court, Perambalur granted bail to the accused (Muthu, age 52) in a POCSO Act case involving his daughter, despite the serious allegations and the prosecution's strong objections. The court imposed stringent bail conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily court appearances, and restrictions against threatening the victim or tampering with witnesses, considering the accused's 77-day remand period and the charge sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Perambalur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case