Muthu vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police All Women PS Perambalur Advocate - THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MAHILA COURT PERAMBALUR — 259/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPB010004222026

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

291/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

259/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Perambalur

Judge

2-Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Muthu

    Adv. T. SENTHIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police All Women PS (Police Station) Perambalur Advocate - THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MAHILA COURT PERAMBALUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Mahila Court, Perambalur granted bail to the accused (Muthu, age 52) in a POCSO Act case involving his daughter, despite the serious allegations and the prosecution's strong objections. The court imposed stringent bail conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily court appearances, and restrictions against threatening the victim or tampering with witnesses, considering the accused's 77-day remand period and the charge sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Await Reports

    Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 259/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Mahila Court, Perambalur granted bail to the accused (Muthu, age 52) in a POCSO Act case involving his daughter, despite the serious allegations and the prosecution's strong objections. The court imposed stringent bail conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily court appearances, and restrictions against threatening the victim or tampering with witnesses, considering the accused's 77-day remand period and the charge sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case