Partha alias Parthipan vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police All Women PS Perambalur Advocate - THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MAHILA COURT PERAMBALUR — 242/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPB010004092026

Case disposed

Filing Number

281/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

242/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Perambalur

Judge

2-Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Partha alias Parthipan

Adv. M. SATHIYASEELAN

Respondent(s)

State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police All Women PS (Police Station) Perambalur Advocate - THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MAHILA COURT PERAMBALUR

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.

07-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Appearance

03-03-2026

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

The Mahila Court, Perambalur dismissed the bail petition of accused Partha @ Parthipan, who is charged with offences under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 366, 427, 506(i) and POCSO Act sections 5(l), 6, 11(4), 12. The court denied bail citing the accused's previous non-appearance and absconding, the need to secure his presence during trial, pending victim examination, and the one-year trial completion mandate under POCSO Act Section 35. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Mahila Court, Perambalur dismissed the bail petition of accused Partha @ Parthipan, who is charged with offences under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 366, 427, 506(i) and POCSO Act sections 5(l), 6, 11(4), 12. The court denied bail citing the accused's previous non-appearance and absconding, the need to secure his presence during trial, pending victim examination, and the one-year trial completion mandate under POCSO Act Section 35. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Perambalur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case