Selvi Thirigeswari vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Padalur PS Advocate - THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MAHILA COURT PERAMBALUR — 241/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPB010004082026

Filing Number

280/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

241/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Perambalur

Judge

2-Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Selvi Thirigeswari

    Adv. E. VALLUVAN NAMBI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Padalur PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MAHILA COURT PERAMBALUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary The Mahila Court, Perambalur granted bail to Selvi Thirigeswari, accused under COTPA Act 2003 and Juvenile Justice Act 2015, considering the remand period and that investigation appeared nearly complete, though she was found with prohibited "Vimal Pakku" bundles. The court imposed stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police station reporting for 30 days, production of address proof, and non-interference with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 241/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Mahila Court, Perambalur granted bail to Selvi Thirigeswari, accused under COTPA Act 2003 and Juvenile Justice Act 2015, considering the remand period and that investigation appeared nearly complete, though she was found with prohibited "Vimal Pakku" bundles. The court imposed stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police station reporting for 30 days, production of address proof, and non-interference with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case