Megarunnisha vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS Advocate - THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MAHILA COURT PERAMBALUR — 253/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPB010004052026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
277/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
253/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Perambalur
Judge
2-Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
136
Police Station
POLICE STATION, PERMBALUR.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Megarunnisha
Adv. Arunan Sundararaju
Respondent(s)
State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MAHILA COURT PERAMBALUR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.
Disposed
Await Reports
Await Reports
Appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 07-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 04-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Mahila Court, Perambalur granted bail to Megarunnisha, accused under COTPA Act 2003 and JJ Act 2015 (allegedly possessing 639.5 grams of contraband), on the grounds that the Investigation Officer failed to object and the remand period suggested investigation completion. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police station reporting for 30 days, address proof submission, non-interference with investigation, and restriction on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Mahila Court, Perambalur granted bail to Megarunnisha, accused under COTPA Act 2003 and JJ Act 2015 (allegedly possessing 639.5 grams of contraband), on the grounds that the Investigation Officer failed to object and the remand period suggested investigation completion. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police station reporting for 30 days, address proof submission, non-interference with investigation, and restriction on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts