Megarunnisha vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS Advocate - THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MAHILA COURT PERAMBALUR — 253/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPB010004052026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
277/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
253/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Perambalur
Judge
2-Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
136
Police Station
POLICE STATION, PERMBALUR.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Megarunnisha
Adv. Arunan Sundararaju
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Perambalur PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MAHILA COURT PERAMBALUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Summary: The Mahila Court, Perambalur granted bail to Megarunnisha, accused under COTPA Act 2003 and JJ Act 2015 (allegedly possessing 639.5 grams of contraband), on the grounds that the Investigation Officer failed to object and the remand period suggested investigation completion. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police station reporting for 30 days, address proof submission, non-interference with investigation, and restriction on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.
-
09-Mar-2026
Await Reports
Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.
-
07-Mar-2026
Await Reports
Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.
-
04-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 253/2026
Summary: The Mahila Court, Perambalur granted bail to Megarunnisha, accused under COTPA Act 2003 and JJ Act 2015 (allegedly possessing 639.5 grams of contraband), on the grounds that the Investigation Officer failed to object and the remand period suggested investigation completion. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police station reporting for 30 days, address proof submission, non-interference with investigation, and restriction on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts