Prabhakaran vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS Advocate - THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MAHILA COURT PERAMBALUR — 244/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPB010004022026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
274/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
244/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Perambalur
Judge
2-Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prabhakaran
Adv. Dineshkumar A
Respondent(s)
State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MAHILA COURT PERAMBALUR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 03-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Court at Perambalur granted bail to the accused in a case involving a missing 14-year-old girl under charges of kidnapping and sexual assault under BNS sections 137(2), 5(1), and POCSO Act provisions. The court imposed stringent bail conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily appearance at the All Women Police Station, restrictions on threatening witnesses or hampering investigation, and prohibition from leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sessions Court at Perambalur granted bail to the accused in a case involving a missing 14-year-old girl under charges of kidnapping and sexual assault under BNS sections 137(2), 5(1), and POCSO Act provisions. The court imposed stringent bail conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily appearance at the All Women Police Station, restrictions on threatening witnesses or hampering investigation, and prohibition from leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts