Jeganathan vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR — 247/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPB010003942026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

270/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

247/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Perambalur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jeganathan

    Adv. R.D.Rajavel

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Perambalur, dismissed Jeganathan's anticipatory bail petition for alleged offences under Section 303(2) of BNS and Section 21(1) of the Mines & Minerals Act, 1957. The court found the petition dismissible because the Public Prosecutor stated that the petitioner was not arrayed as an accused in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Counter

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 247/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Perambalur, dismissed Jeganathan's anticipatory bail petition for alleged offences under Section 303(2) of BNS and Section 21(1) of the Mines & Minerals Act, 1957. The court found the petition dismissible because the Public Prosecutor stated that the petitioner was not arrayed as an accused in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case