Kannan vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Arumbavur PS Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR — 239/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPB010003812026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
260/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
239/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Perambalur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 11-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kannan
Adv. Rajkumar M Advocate
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Arumbavur PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Case Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Perambalur granted bail to Kannan, accused of illegal electricity theft and culpable homicide after a man died from electrocution on his field. The court considered that the accused had spent 30 days in judicial custody with no prior criminal record, and found a changed circumstance warranting release. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, and strict conditions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
05-Mar-2026
Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
03-Mar-2026
Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 239/2026
Case Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Perambalur granted bail to Kannan, accused of illegal electricity theft and culpable homicide after a man died from electrocution on his field. The court considered that the accused had spent 30 days in judicial custody with no prior criminal record, and found a changed circumstance warranting release. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, and strict conditions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts