Saravanan vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Padalur PS Advocate - THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MAHILA COURT PERAMBALUR — 254/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPB010003682026
e-Filing Number
24-02-2026
Filing Number
251/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
254/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Perambalur
Judge
2-Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
56
Police Station
POLICE STATION, PADALUR, PERAMBALUR.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Saravanan
Adv. PAKUTHARIVALAN A
Respondent(s)
State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Padalur PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MAHILA COURT PERAMBALUR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.
Disposed
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
Appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 09-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 07-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 04-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY: The Mahila Court, Perambalur granted bail to Saravanan, accused of tobacco product violations under COTPA Act 2003 and Juvenile Justice Act 2015, after considering that the investigation period was likely complete and stringent conditions could secure his presence. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police station reporting for 30 days, proof of permanent address, non-interference with investigation, and restrictions on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Mahila Court, Perambalur granted bail to Saravanan, accused of tobacco product violations under COTPA Act 2003 and Juvenile Justice Act 2015, after considering that the investigation period was likely complete and stringent conditions could secure his presence. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police station reporting for 30 days, proof of permanent address, non-interference with investigation, and restrictions on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts