State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS vs Kalyanasundaram A1 Advocate - T.R. BASKAR — 215/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 311. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPB010003592026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

242/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

215/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Perambalur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

67

Police Station

POLICE STATION, V. KALATHUR, PERAMBALUR.

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 311

Petitioner(s)

State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS (Police Station)

Adv. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR

Respondent(s)

Kalyanasundaram A1 Advocate - T.R. BASKAR

Samidurai A2

Adv. T.R. BASKAR

Samidurai A3

Adv. T.R. BASKAR

Chelladhurai (died) A4

Adv. T.R. BASKAR

Azhaguvelsamy A5

Adv. T.R. BASKAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

16-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Orders

27-02-2026

Counter

23-02-2026

Counter

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

The Perambalur District and Sessions Court allowed the prosecution's petition under Section 311 of the CrPC to recall witnesses PW6 and PW10 (doctors) to mark CT scan and X-ray images as evidence, which were obtained after these witnesses had already testified. The court held that Section 311 grants wide discretion to recall witnesses if their evidence is essential for just decision-making, and the accused retain full cross-examination rights, rejecting the defense argument that delayed filing and involvement of radiologists made the petition unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Perambalur District and Sessions Court allowed the prosecution's petition under Section 311 of the CrPC to recall witnesses PW6 and PW10 (doctors) to mark CT scan and X-ray images as evidence, which were obtained after these witnesses had already testified. The court held that Section 311 grants wide discretion to recall witnesses if their evidence is essential for just decision-making, and the accused retain full cross-examination rights, rejecting the defense argument that delayed filing and involvement of radiologists made the petition unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Perambalur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case