State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS vs Kalyanasundaram A1 Advocate - T.R. BASKAR — 215/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 311. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPB010003592026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
242/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
215/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Perambalur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
67
Police Station
POLICE STATION, V. KALATHUR, PERAMBALUR.
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS (Police Station)
Adv. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR
Respondent(s)
Kalyanasundaram A1 Advocate - T.R. BASKAR
Samidurai A2
Adv. T.R. BASKAR
Samidurai A3
Adv. T.R. BASKAR
Chelladhurai (died) A4
Adv. T.R. BASKAR
Azhaguvelsamy A5
Adv. T.R. BASKAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Disposed
Orders
Counter
Counter
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 27-02-2026 | Counter | |
| 23-02-2026 | Counter |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Perambalur District and Sessions Court allowed the prosecution's petition under Section 311 of the CrPC to recall witnesses PW6 and PW10 (doctors) to mark CT scan and X-ray images as evidence, which were obtained after these witnesses had already testified. The court held that Section 311 grants wide discretion to recall witnesses if their evidence is essential for just decision-making, and the accused retain full cross-examination rights, rejecting the defense argument that delayed filing and involvement of radiologists made the petition unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Perambalur District and Sessions Court allowed the prosecution's petition under Section 311 of the CrPC to recall witnesses PW6 and PW10 (doctors) to mark CT scan and X-ray images as evidence, which were obtained after these witnesses had already testified. The court held that Section 311 grants wide discretion to recall witnesses if their evidence is essential for just decision-making, and the accused retain full cross-examination rights, rejecting the defense argument that delayed filing and involvement of radiologists made the petition unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts