State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS vs Kalyanasundaram A1 Advocate - T.R. BASKAR — 215/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 311. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPB010003592026

Filing Number

242/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

215/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Perambalur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

67

Police Station

POLICE STATION, V. KALATHUR, PERAMBALUR.

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 311

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS (Police Station)

    Adv. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kalyanasundaram A1 Advocate - T.R. BASKAR

  2. 2.Samidurai A2

    Adv. T.R. BASKAR

  3. 3.Samidurai A3

    Adv. T.R. BASKAR

  4. 4.Chelladhurai (died) A4

    Adv. T.R. BASKAR

  5. 5.Azhaguvelsamy A5

    Adv. T.R. BASKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Perambalur District and Sessions Court allowed the prosecution's petition under Section 311 of the CrPC to recall witnesses PW6 and PW10 (doctors) to mark CT scan and X-ray images as evidence, which were obtained after these witnesses had already testified. The court held that Section 311 grants wide discretion to recall witnesses if their evidence is essential for just decision-making, and the accused retain full cross-examination rights, rejecting the defense argument that delayed filing and involvement of radiologists made the petition unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Counter

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 215/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Perambalur District and Sessions Court allowed the prosecution's petition under Section 311 of the CrPC to recall witnesses PW6 and PW10 (doctors) to mark CT scan and X-ray images as evidence, which were obtained after these witnesses had already testified. The court held that Section 311 grants wide discretion to recall witnesses if their evidence is essential for just decision-making, and the accused retain full cross-examination rights, rejecting the defense argument that delayed filing and involvement of radiologists made the petition unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case