Seeni Alias Seenivasan vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Padalur PS Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR — 5/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(3)(a). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 01st April 2026.
CRLA - Criminal Appeal
CNR: TNPB010001022025
e-Filing Number
03-01-2025
Filing Number
88/2025
Filing Date
06-01-2025
Registration No
5/2025
Registration Date
22-01-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Perambalur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
520
Police Station
POLICE STATION, PADALUR, PERAMBALUR.
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Seeni Alias Seenivasan
Adv. TAMILSELVAN N
Respondent(s)
State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Padalur PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Perambalur Principal District and Sessions Court dismissed the criminal appeal of Seeni @ Seenivasan, confirming his conviction under IPC Section 397 (dacoity/robbery with injury) for assaulting and robbing a gold chain from an elderly woman in 2016. The court found the victim's testimony credible, corroborated by recovery of the stolen chain and the accused's confession, rejecting defense arguments about missing weapons and procedural irregularities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Perambalur Principal District and Sessions Court dismissed the criminal appeal of Seeni @ Seenivasan, confirming his conviction under IPC Section 397 (dacoity/robbery with injury) for assaulting and robbing a gold chain from an elderly woman in 2016. The court found the victim's testimony credible, corroborated by recovery of the stolen chain and the accused's confession, rejecting defense arguments about missing weapons and procedural irregularities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts